Прем’єр Македонії хоче довести до кінця зміну назви країни попри провал референдуму
У своїх заявах він посилається на «волю народу» й нагадує, що серед учасників референдуму 91,46 відсотка проголосували за договір із сусідньою Грецією
…
У своїх заявах він посилається на «волю народу» й нагадує, що серед учасників референдуму 91,46 відсотка проголосували за договір із сусідньою Грецією
…
It is the biggest-ever and the best trade deal in the world – that’s how U.S. President Donald Trump and members of his administration are touting a new trade pact they have reached with neighbors Canada and Mexico.
“This landmark agreement will send cash and jobs pouring into the United States and into North America,” predicted Trump.
After intense last-minute discussions just ahead of a self-imposed Sunday midnight deadline, the United States and Canada announced they had reached a deal, allowing a modified three-way pact with Mexico to replace the nearly quarter-century-old North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
“This is a terrific deal for all of us,” Trump said in a victory speech in the White House Rose Garden where he was surrounded by several members of his Cabinet and his trade negotiators who had worked to achieve the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
The pact, underpinning $1.2 trillion in annual trade, is based on “fairness and reciprocity,” according to Trump, who added that it was reached after disagreements with his counterparts in Mexico City and Ottawa, Enrique Pena Nieto and Justin Trudeau.
Trump said he spoke to both leaders on Monday.
‘Most competitive’
The agreement will consolidate the North American region “as one of the most competitive in the world,” according to the Mexican president on Twitter.
“This deal makes our partnership even stronger and benefits people across North America,” Trudeau tweeted.
The pact is expected to be signed in 60 days by the three leaders, possibly at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in late November in Argentina.
Foreign outsourcing for U.S. automotive production will be reduced under the deal, said Trump, who predicted “once USMCA is approved, it will be a new dawn for the U.S. auto industry and the U.S. auto worker,” turning the country again into “a manufacturing powerhouse.”
While the president told reporters that he is “not at all confident” Congress – which could see the House back under control of the opposition Democrats after the November midterm elections — will approve the deal, other members of his administration are expressing greater optimism.
“There could be Democratic support for this” as it contains provisions favorable to American labor – a traditional backer of the Democratic Party, National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow tells VOA.
“I think it’s going to pass with a substantial majority,” predicts U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. “This is not a Republican-only agreement. It was not designed to be a Republican-only agreement. There are really no poison pills in here for Democrats.”
“Democrats will closely scrutinize the text of the Trump administration’s NAFTA proposal and look forward to further analyses and conversations with stakeholders,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said in a statement.
Trump had made criticism of NAFTA a centerpiece of his successful 2016 election campaign, terming it the worst trade deal in history and blaming NAFTA for the loss of American manufacturing jobs since it went into effect in 1994.
The U.S. agreement with Ottawa will boost American access to Canada’s dairy market – with some concessions on its heavily protected supply management system — while shielding the Canadians from possible U.S. auto tariffs.
Steel and aluminum tariffs imposed by Washington, however, will remain. Canada had demanded protection from Trump’s tariffs on imported steel and aluminum.
“For those babies out there who keep talking about tariffs,” this deal would not have happened without tariffs, Trump told reporters during a nearly 80-minute event in the White House Rose Garden.
The metal tariffs discussions are on a “completely separate track,” according to a senior U.S. official.
In a big victory for Canada, NAFTA’s Chapter 19 dispute resolution system, which involves anti-dumping and countervailing decisions, will remain intact.
‘Deadline was real’
The Trump administration had imposed a midnight Sunday deadline for Trudeau’s government to reach agreement on an updated NAFTA or face exclusion from the treaty.
“This deadline was real,” according to a senior U.S. official. “We ended up in a good place that we ultimately think is a good deal for all three countries.”
U.S. officials, in recent weeks, had been adamant that the text for a new deal – whether it would only be with Mexico or also include Canada – to be released by September 30 to meet congressional notification requirements and to allow outgoing Mexican President Pena Nieto to be able to sign the deal before he is succeeded by Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, a left-wing populist.
Canada’s government had faced strong opposition to elements of the revised pact from the country’s dairy farmers. Voters in Quebec, home to 354,000 dairy cows – the most of any province — head to the polls for provincial elections Monday, which cast a shadow over the last-minute negotiations.
The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in the United States declared itself “extremely encouraged” by initial details of the new three-way pact.
“As we review the agreement text, we will be looking to ensure that this deal opens markets, raises standards, provides enforcement and modernizes trade rules so that manufacturers across the United States can grow our economy,” NAM President and Chief Executive Officer Jay Timmons said.
“This administration is committed to strong and effective enforcement of this agreement,” a senior U.S. official told reporters. “This is not going to just be words on paper. This is real.”
…
У Грузії з 1 жовтня набула чинності заборона використання тонких одноразових поліетиленових пакетів, повідомляє Радіо Тавісуплеба – грузинська служба Радіо Свобода.
Розпорядження уряду про це підписали 14 вересня.
А з квітня 2019 року будуть заборонені всі поліетиленові пакети. Дозволені будуть тільки біодеградовані – тобто зроблені з матеріалів, що розкладаються у природі.
На всіх пакетах у Грузії надалі має бути інформація з підтвердженням, що вони розкладаються, складом та назвою виробника.
Порушення нових правил каратиметься штрафом у розмірі 500 ларі (нині це понад 5400 гривень) за перший випадок та 1000 ларі (понад 10 тисяч 800 гривень), якщо порушення фіксується не вперше.
У Мережі природоохоронних організацій Кавказу розповіли, що звичайний пластиковий пакет розкладається у природі приблизно за 450 років.
За даними екологів, у 2012 році кількість пластикового сміття у Світовому океані становила приблизно 165 мільйонів тонн. У 2014 році на поверхні океану лежало 268 940 тонн пластику. Загальна кількість окремих частин відходів з пластмаси становить понад п’ять трильйонів.
…
Китай відмовився від щорічної зустрічі з представниками Міністерства оборони Сполучених Штатів, запланованої на середину жовтня – таку заяву американської влади публікують західні ЗМІ.
Переговори мали відбутися в Пекіні і стосуватися питань безпеки. Планувалося, що на них приїде голова Пентагону Джим Меттіс.
Згідно з повідомленням американських урядовців, у Пекіні заявили, що високопосадовець армії Китаю не зможе зустрітися з представником американського уряду.
Рішення відмовитися від зустрічі високого рівня, що створювала можливості для дипломатичного та безпекового діалогу, розглядають у США як чергову ознаку погіршення відносин між Пекіном і Вашингтоном через так звану «торгівельну війну».
За припущеннями, зниження економічної співпраці позначилося на взаємному розумінні в інших спільних стратегічних питаннях, таких як Тайвань, продаж зброї та ситуація в Південно-Китайському морі.
Читайте також: «Азійські компанії згортають виробництво в Китаї через мита США – ЗМІ»
В ході «торгівельної війни» між Китаєм і США країни запровадили низку митних обмежень щодо одна одної.
17 вересня президент США Дональд Трамп анонсував нові санкції проти китайських товарів – 10% мита на китайський експорт в обсязі 200 мільярдів доларів.
Президент США також погрожував ввести третю хвилю тарифів на 267 мільярдів, що охопить весь експорт Китаю до Сполучених Штатів.
У липні США ввели мита в 25% на китайські товари на суму 50 мільярдів доларів. Китай відповів на це дзеркально. У список товарів, затверджених Вашингтоном, зокрема, ввійшли електроніка та медобладнання, вироблена в Китаї. Пекін підняв тарифи на зерно і продукти харчування, які постачаються з США.
Крім того, 27 вересня Дональд Трамп звинуватив Пекін у спробах втрутитися у вибори до американського Конгресу, заплановані на листопад 2018 року.
…
After less than two years and a precipitous decline in the share price at General Electric, John Flannery is being ousted as chairman and CEO.
Flannery took over for longtime CEO Jeff Immelt in June 2017 with the company trying to re-establish its industrial roots, albeit a high-tech version of itself.
However, as Flannery has restructured the multinational conglomerate, its value has dipped below $100 billion and shares are down more than 35 percent this year.
GE warned Monday that it will miss its profit forecasts this year and it’s taking a $23 billion charge.
The company said Monday that H. Lawrence Culp Jr. will take over as chairman and CEO immediately.
Shares of General Electric Co., based in Boston, surged 9 percent before the opening bell.
your ads here!
After intense last-minute discussions ahead of a self-imposed midnight deadline, U.S. and Canadian officials announced late Sunday they reached a trade deal, allowing a modified three-way pact with Mexico to replace the nearly quarter-century old North American Free Trade Agreement.
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) — underpinning $1.2 trillion in annual trade — is expected to be signed in 60 days by President Donald Trump and his Canadian and Mexican counterparts.
Trump hailed the “wonderful new Trade Deal” on Monday and calling it a “great deal for all three countries” that “solves the many deficiencies and mistakes in NAFTA.”
Trump had made criticism of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) a centerpiece of his successful 2016 election campaign.
“The worst trade deal maybe ever signed anywhere, but certainly ever signed in this country,” Trump had termed NAFTA, blaming it for the loss of American manufacturing jobs since it went into effect in 1994.
The U.S. Congress is likely to act on USMCA next year. Its fate in the hands of American lawmakers remains far from certain, especially if the Democrats would take back control of the House of Representatives in the November midterm elections.
“USMCA will give our workers, farmers, ranchers and businesses a high-standard trade agreement that will result in freer markets, fairer trade and robust economic growth in our region,” said U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland in a joint statement. “It will strengthen the middle class, and create good, well-paying jobs and new opportunities for the nearly half billion people who call North America home.”
The U.S. agreement with Ottawa will boost American access to Canada’s dairy market — with some concessions on its heavily protected supply management system — while shielding the Canadians from possible U.S. auto tariffs.
Steel and aluminum tariffs imposed by Washington, will remain, however. Canada had demanded protection from Trump’s tariffs on imported steel and aluminum.
The metal tariffs discussions are on a “completely separate track,” according to a senior U.S. official.
In a big victory for Canada, NAFTA’s Chapter 19 dispute resolution system will remain intact.
Leaving a Sunday night 75-minute Cabinet meeting, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau only said it was “a good day for Canada.”
The Trump administration had imposed a midnight Sunday deadline for Trudeau’s government to reach agreement on an updated NAFTA, or face exclusion from the treaty.
“This deadline was real,” according to a senior U.S. official. “We ended up in a good place that we ultimately think is a good deal for all three countries.”
U.S. officials, in recent weeks, had been adamant that the text for a new deal — whether it would only be with Mexico or also include Canada — to be released by September 30 to meet congressional notification requirements and to allow outgoing Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto to be able to sign the deal before he is succeeded by Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, a left-wing populist.
Canada’s government had faced strong opposition to elements of the revised pact from the country’s dairy farmers. Voters in Quebec, home to 354,000 dairy cows – the most of any province — head to the polls for provincial elections Monday, which cast a shadow over the last-minute negotiations.
The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in the United States declared itself “extremely encouraged” by initial details of the new three-way pact.
“As we review the agreement text, we will be looking to ensure that this deal opens markets, raises standards, provides enforcement and modernizes trade rules so that manufacturers across the United States can grow our economy,” said NAM President and Chief Executive Officer Jay Timmons.
“This administration is committed to strong and effective enforcement of this agreement,” a senior U.S. official told reporters. “This is not going to just be words on paper. This is real.”
…
After lengthy delays, an $8.2 billion revamp of a colonial-era rail line snaking from the Arabian Sea to the foothills of the Hindu Kush has become a test of Pakistan’s ability to rethink signature Chinese “Silk Road” projects due to debt concerns.
The rail megaproject linking the coastal metropolis of Karachi to the northwestern city of Peshawar is China’s biggest Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) project in Pakistan, but Islamabad has balked at the cost and financing terms.
Resistance has stiffened under the new government of populist Prime Minister Imran Khan, who has voiced alarm about rising debt levels and says the country must wean itself off foreign loans.
“We are seeing how to develop a model so the government of Pakistan wouldn’t have all the risk,” Khusro Bakhtyar, minister in Pakistan’s planning ministry, told reporters recently.
The cooling of enthusiasm for China’s investments mirrors the unease of incoming governments in Sri Lanka, Malaysia and Maldives, where new administrations have come to power wary of Chinese deals struck by their predecessors.
Pakistan’s new government had wanted to review all BRI contracts. Officials say there are concerns the deals were badly negotiated, too expensive or overly favored China.
But to Islamabad’s frustration, Beijing is only willing to review projects that have not yet begun, three senior government officials have told Reuters.
China’s Foreign Ministry said, in a statement in response to questions faxed by Reuters, that both sides were committed to pressing forward with BRI projects, “to ensure those projects that are already built operate as normal, and those which are being built proceed smoothly.”
Pakistani officials say they remain committed to Chinese investment but want to push harder on price and affordability, while re-orientating the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) — for which Beijing has pledged about $60 billion in infrastructure funds — to focus on projects that deliver social development in line with Khan’s election platform.
China’s Ambassador to Pakistan, Yao Jing, told Reuters that Beijing was open to changes proposed by the new government and “we will definitely follow their agenda” to work out a roadmap for BRI projects based on “mutual consultation.”
“It constitutes a process of discussion with each other about this kind of model, about this kind of roadmap for the future,” Yao said.
Beijing would only proceed with projects that Pakistan wanted, he added. “This is Pakistan’s economy, this is their society,” Yao said.
Islamabad’s efforts to recalibrate CPEC are made trickier by its dependence on Chinese loans to prop up its vulnerable economy.
Growing fissures in relations with Pakistan’s historic ally the United States have also weakened the country’s negotiating hand, as has a current account crisis likely to lead to a bailout by the International Monetary Fund, which may demand spending cuts.
“We have reservations, but no other country is investing in Pakistan. What can we do?” one Pakistani minister told Reuters.
Crumbling railways
The ML-1 rail line is the spine of country’s dilapidated rail network, which has in recent years been edging toward collapse as passenger numbers plunge, train lines close and the vital freight business nosedives.
Khan’s government has vowed to make the 1,872 km (1,163 mile) line a priority CPEC project, saying it will help the poor travel across the vast South Asian nation.
But Islamabad is exploring funding options for CPEC projects that depart from the traditional BRI lending model — whereby host nations take on Chinese debt to finance construction of infrastructure – and has invited Saudi Arabia and other countries to invest.
One option for ML-1, according to Pakistani officials, is the build-operate-transfer (BOT) model, which would see investors or companies finance and build the project and recoup their investment from cashflows generated mainly by the rail freight business, before returning it to Pakistan in a few decades time.
Yao, the Chinese envoy, said Beijing was open to BOT and would “encourage” its companies to invest.
Rail mega-projects under China’s BRI umbrella have run into problems elsewhere in Asia. A line linking Thailand and Laos has been beset by delays over financing, while Malaysia’s new Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad outright cancelled the Chinese-funded $20 billion East Coast Rail Link (ECRL).
Beijing is happy to offer loans, but reticent to invest in the Pakistan venture as such projects are seldom profitable, according to Andrew Small, author of a book on China-Pakistan relations.
“The problem is that the Chinese don’t think they can make money on this project and are not keen on BOT,” said Small.
Off-book debts
During President Xi Jinping’s visit to Pakistan in 2015, the ML-1 line was placed among a list of “early harvest” CPEC projects that would be prioritized, along with power plants urgently needed to end crippling electricity shortages.
But while many other projects from that list have now been completed the rail scheme has been stuck.
Pakistani officials say they became wary of how early BRI contracts were awarded to Chinese firms, and are pushing for a public tender for ML-1.
Partly to help with price discovery, Pakistan asked the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to finance a chunk of the rail project through tendering. The ADB began discussions on a $1.5-2 billion loan, but China insisted the project was “too strategic”, and Islamabad kicked out the ADB under pressure from Beijing in early 2017, according to Pakistani and ADB officials.
“If it’s such a strategic project then it should be a viable project for them to finance on very concessional terms or invest in?” said one senior Pakistani official familiar with the project, referring to the BOT model.
China’s foreign ministry said Beijing was engaged in “friendly consultations” with Pakistan on the rail project.
Chinese companies participated in BRI projects in an open and transparent way, “pooling benefits and sharing risks,” it said.
Analysts say Pakistan will struggle to attract non-Chinese investors into the project, which may force it to choose between piling on Chinese debt or walking away from the project. In 2017, Pakistan turned down Chinese funding for a $14 billion mega-dam project in the Himalayas due to cost concerns and worries Beijing could end up owning a vital national asset if Pakistan could not repay loans, as occurred with a Sri Lankan port.
Khan’s government chafes at several Chinese intercity mass transport projects in Punjab, the voter heartland of the previous government, which now need hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies every year.
They also fume about the risk of accumulating off-books sovereign debt through power contracts, where annual profits of above 20 percent, in dollar terms, were guaranteed by the previous administration.
With the ML-1 line, there are also those who harbor doubts closer to home, including the previous government’s finance minister, Miftah Ismail, who said his ministry had always had concerns about its viability.
“When people say it’s a project of national importance, that usually means it makes no sense financially,” he said.
…
На референдумі про нову назву Македонії цю зміну підтримали понад 90 відсотків його учасників, та сам референдум вважається таким, що не відбувся
…